How to Evaluate Autonomous-Trucking Vendors: A Technical RFP Checklist for Integrations

Hook: Why your next autonomous-trucking RFP must be a technical integration audit

Integrating autonomous trucking capacity feels like adding a new cloud provider — but faster, higher-risk and with hardware in the loop. Carriers and shippers lose revenue for every failed tender or untracked movement. IT teams inherit contracts, APIs and real-time telemetry from vendors they didn’t build. If you’re evaluating autonomous-truck vendors in 2026, the RFP has to be more than price and lane coverage: it must be a technical integration checklist that quantifies APIs, data contracts, security, uptime/SLA, observability and migration risk.

Top-line takeaways (inverted pyramid)

• Demand concrete API contracts (OpenAPI + event schemas) and contract tests from vendors.
• Require security proofs — mTLS, RBAC, SOC 2/ISO27001, SBOMs for edge software.
• Insist on measurable SLOs and outage playbooks with financial or operational remedies.
• Make observability non-negotiable: OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and a dedicated telemetry SLA.
• Score migration risk with a reproducible pilot and rollback plan; avoid tool sprawl.

Why this matters in 2026

Late-2025 and early-2026 saw the first TMS integrations exposing autonomous capacity natively into carrier workflows — for example, Aurora’s API link to McLeod’s TMS that allowed tendering and dispatching directly from the TMS. That integration proved one thing: vendors with robust APIs and clear data contracts win adoption fast. At the same time, the industry’s regulatory landscape and supply-chain security expectations tightened, and organizations increasingly demand standardized telemetry and SLO-centric SLAs rather than vague “uptime” promises.

How to structure your technical RFP

Split the RFP into four technical pillars and an overall migration evaluation: APIs & data contracts, Security & compliance, Uptime / SLA & operational resilience, Observability & telemetry, and Migration risk & integration playbook. For each pillar, require declarative evidence, runnable artifacts, and acceptance criteria for pilots.

1) APIs & Data Contracts — the interface is your contract

Questions to ask and items to require in the RFP:

• Provide an OpenAPI (v3+) specification for all REST endpoints, hosted in a versioned repo (Git) with tags for releases.
• Provide AsyncAPI or equivalent schemas for streaming events (tracking, heartbeat, exceptions).
• Publish message and payload schemas (JSON Schema / Avro / Protobuf) in a schema registry and document semantic versioning policy.
• Supply a set of contract tests (Pact, schema-validator, or Postman collections) runnable in CI to validate compatibility.
• Detail rate limits, throttling strategies, retry semantics, idempotency keys, and a canonical error model.
• Show concrete sample requests and responses for core flows: tender, accept, dispatch update, location heartbeat, incident report.
• State authentication mechanism: OAuth2 client credentials, mTLS, JWT claims, scopes.

Example: tendering API (sample payload)

{
  "tender_id": "tnr-20260117-001",
  "origin": {"lat": 41.8781, "lon": -87.6298, "facility_id": "wh-chi-01"},
  "destination": {"lat": 34.0522, "lon": -118.2437, "facility_id": "wh-la-02"},
  "equipment_type": "53_dry_van",
  "pickup_date_window": {"earliest": "2026-02-01T08:00:00Z", "latest": "2026-02-01T17:00:00Z"},
  "service_options": {"refrigeration": false, "hazmat": false},
  "expected_rate_cents": 125000
}

Require vendor to supply a mock server and a Postman collection or OpenAPI mock for your integration testing.

2) Security & Compliance — not an add-on

Autonomous systems combine cloud, edge, and physical hardware. Your RFP must verify security across all layers.

• Provide independent third-party certifications and recent audit reports: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001. For government work, request FedRAMP or equivalent if applicable.
• Require SBOMs (Software Bill of Materials) for the edge software and components running in trucks.
• Demand mTLS for service-to-service communications and signed firmware updates for vehicle software.
• Ask for published vulnerability disclosure policy and a recent CVE remediation timeline for critical findings.
• Request proof of role-based access control (RBAC), least privilege in APIs, and audit logs retention policies.
• Clarify data residency, encryption-in-transit and at-rest, and PII-handling commitments (data retention & deletion APIs).

Security is not 'we'll do it later' — it must be demonstrable in CI/CD, build artifacts (SBOM), and operations (patch cadence).

3) Uptime, SLA & Operational Resilience

Don’t accept vague uptime numbers. Define operational outcomes.

• Ask for explicit SLA / SLOs expressed as metrics: % successful tenders, API availability, event delivery latency P50/P95, and mean time to acknowledgment for incidents.
• Require an Incident Response Playbook with escalation contacts, on-call SLAs, and runbook excerpts for common failure modes (telemetry loss, location drift, vehicle offline).
• Request historical availability and incident metrics for the last 12 months and postmortems for significant outages.
• Confirm geographic failover design: multi-region, edge buffering, store-and-forward for telemetry during connectivity loss.
• Define operational remedies for SLA breaches: credits, expedited remediation, or exit clauses for repeated breaches.

4) Observability & Telemetry — the integration can’t be a black box

Observability determines whether you can troubleshoot integrations in production.

• Require vendor to emit metrics, traces and logs in an OpenTelemetry-compatible format and provide a mapping of metric names, labels, and trace spans to your internal taxonomy.
• Ask for a documented telemetry contract: what events will be emitted, frequency, retention, and sample rates.
• Require exports or push options to your telemetry backend (Prometheus remote write, OTLP, Kafka topics for events).
• Demand distributed tracing that ties tender requests to vehicle activities so you can trace a failed tender from TMS through vendor systems to the truck.
• Include expectations for business-level telemetry: tender acceptance latency, lane-specific acceptance rates, and EMV (expected monetary value) impact on failed tenders.

5) Migration Risk & Integration Playbook — the deal fails during cutover, not during evaluation

Vendors will promise easy onboarding. Your RFP must force them to prove it.

• Require a staged integration plan: sandbox → pilot lanes → hybrid coexistence → full cutover.
• Ask for a rollback strategy and a quantified risk model for each migration phase (impact, probability, mitigation).
• Demand a concrete pilot acceptance criteria (KPIs, sample size, duration) signed by both parties.
• Request the vendor provide migration automation artifacts: Terraform for infra, Helm charts for software, CI/CD pipeline examples for deployments and contract tests.
• Insist on integration runbooks and a joint run of failure scenarios (network loss, misrouted loads, data schema change) before go-live.

Scoring rubric — quantifying vendor responses

Use a weighted scoring model to compare vendors. Here’s a recommended weight distribution for technical evaluation (adjust to your priorities):

• APIs & Data Contracts — 30%
• Security & Compliance — 25%
• Uptime / SLA & Resilience — 15%
• Observability & Telemetry — 15%
• Migration Risk & Playbook — 15%

For each pillar, score on a 1–5 scale against mandatory sub-criteria (evidence, runnable artifacts, timelines). Require a minimum pass threshold (e.g., 70%) to proceed to commercial negotiation.

Sample RFP clauses and acceptance tests

API contract clause

Vendor must deliver an OpenAPI 3 specification, a mock server, and a Postman collection in a versioned repository by contract signing. Acceptance test: our CI runs the collection and validates schema compliance within sandbox.

Security clause

Vendor must provide SOC 2 Type II report and SBOM for edge fleet. Acceptance test: vendor demonstrates signed OTA update over mTLS and provides proof of SRP/RBAC configuration in a demo environment.

SLA clause

Vendor guarantees API availability 99.95% monthly, tender acceptance rate >= 95% for contracted lanes (excluding force majeure). Remedies: service credits tiered by % below SLA.

Observability clause

Vendor must emit OTLP traces and Prometheus metrics. Acceptance test: ingest vendor telemetry into our staging tracing stack and run a trace linking tender -> vendor -> vehicle for three sample tenders.

Pilot playbook — practical, actionable steps

1. Discovery (2 weeks): Inventory systems (TMS, WMS, carrier portals), map APIs, identify mapping transforms and auth methods.
2. Sandbox integration (2–4 weeks): Connect to vendor mock endpoints, run contract tests, validate schema compatibility, automate test runs in CI.
3. Pilot lane selection (4–8 weeks): Choose low-risk lanes with production-like telemetry. Define pilot KPIs: acceptance rate, on-time pickup, telemetry completeness.
4. Pilot execution (8–12 weeks): Run mixed loads (manual + autonomous) with feature flags, monitor SLOs, conduct weekly postmortems on failures.
5. Hybrid coexistence (4 weeks): Gradually increase volume, test failover to human-driven capacity, validate billing and settlement reconciliation.
6. Cutover & hypercare (2–4 weeks): Formal cutover with rollback gates, 24/7 support on-call, runbooks at hand, telemetry dashboards pinned.
7. Post-cutover review (ongoing): Quarterly SLO reviews, change control for schema changes, and a continuous contract testing cadence.

Mitigations for common integration failures

• Schema drift: enforce contract tests in CI and require semantic versioning; reject breaking changes without migration guide.
• Telemetry gaps: require local buffering on vehicles and store-and-forward events when connectivity returns.
• Rate spikes: implement adaptive throttling and request queuing; vendors must provide rate-limit headers and backoff guidance.
• Operational surprises: run game-day exercises simulating control-plane outages and rolling firmware updates.

Example acceptance test: end-to-end trace

Acceptance criteria: After tender creation in your TMS, an end-to-end trace must show:

1. TMS -> Vendor API request (idempotency key present)
2. Vendor ack/response with tender_id and ETA
3. Vendor emit dispatch-to-vehicle event
4. Vehicle emits location heartbeat events tied to dispatch
   • Latency P95 for heartbeat < 15s when cellular available
5. Tender completion or exception event with code and suggested remediation

Run this scenario 50 times across pilot lanes; acceptance = >= 95% successful traces with required fields.

Regulatory & legal items to include

• Data processing agreement with vendor for telemetry and PII.
• Insurance and liability allocations for incidents during autonomous operations.
• Data retention and deletion APIs with proof of deletion logs.
• Right to audit clause for security posture and compliance artifacts.

2026 trends and future-proofing your RFP

As of 2026 the market is moving toward API-first partnerships (TMS vendors embedding autonomy), standardized telemetry (wider OpenTelemetry adoption in logistics), and contract-driven integrations (schema registries and contract testing). Expect:

• More TMS-native autonomous capacity integrations: tighten your RFP to mandate direct TMS APIs and out-of-the-box tendering adapters.
• Stronger emphasis on supply-chain security: require SBOMs and signed OTA updates.
• Greater use of edge compute and local buffering: demand clear designs and telemetry guarantees for intermittent connectivity.
• Movement toward marketplace models where carriers can switch between autonomous vendors — design your contracts and APIs for portability.

Checklist: Minimum items to include in every technical RFP

• OpenAPI + AsyncAPI specs, versioned in Git
• Schema registry and contract tests
• Mock servers and Postman collections for CI
• mTLS + OAuth2 authentication patterns
• SOC 2 Type II / ISO27001 and SBOMs
• Concrete SLOs (API availability, tender acceptance rate, telemetry latency)
• Incident response & escalation playbook
• Observability contract (OTLP, Prometheus, trace/span definitions)
• Staged migration plan with rollback gates and pilot acceptance criteria
• Right to audit and exit/termination remedies for SLA breaches

Final risk scoring example (quick template)

Score each vendor 1–5 per item, multiply by weights from the rubric and compute a total score. Add a manual risk adjustment based on commercial terms and lane coverage.

Closing: convert the RFP into an executable integration plan

Viewing the RFP as a legal artifact is a mistake. Treat it as the executable integration playbook: require runnable artifacts, automated tests, and pilot acceptance criteria. Vendors who deliver self-service mock servers, schema registries, and telemetry exports will be easiest to integrate and operate.

Remember the lesson from 2025: the teams that won early production adoption were those who exposed autonomous capacity via stable APIs to TMS and provided operational telemetry. If your RFP forces vendors to prove APIs, security and observability before signing, you reduce migration risk and speed time-to-value.

Call to action

Use this checklist to update your next autonomous-trucking RFP. Need a starter repo with OpenAPI templates, contract tests and a pilot runbook tailored to your TMS? Reach out to DataWizards for a hands-on workshop and a customizable RFP pack that reduces integration time by up to 60% based on our 2025 client benchmarks.

Related Reading

• Amiibo Farming and RNG: Are In-Game Unlocks a Form of Gambling?
• Sports Calendar Shake-Up: How AFCON Moving to Every Four Years Impacts Broadcasters, Clubs and Betting Firms
• Pocket Warmers & Stadium Essentials: Small Items That Make Big Matchday Differences
• Ribbons & Releases: Designing Limited Edition Typewriter Prints for Album Launches and Graphic Novels
• Cozy Engagement Photoshoot Ideas Using Hot-Water Bottles and Fleece Props